🔗 Share this article

England have been knocked out of a World Cup after losing a match they were heavily favored in, thanks to a surprise performance which nobody saw coming. Does that ring a bell? This is because it applies to two events involving England which took place almost exactly a year separated: recently, their ODI World Cup semi-final loss at the hands of South Africa; a year ago, their loss in a must-win group stage match against West Indies in the 20-over version.

The Interim Period

In the interim, there was a whitewash in the Ashes and a thorough analysis which was meant to change everything. Was it successful? Let’s look a little more closely into those two World Cup eliminations. In 2024, England collapsed, dropped five catches, and allowed a aggressive batting display from Qiana Joseph to win the day. More recently, a player with beautiful technique and temperament – the South Africa captain, Laura Wolvaardt – demonstrated why she is among the elite in cricket. She gave precisely one chance – a catch to Alice Capsey at long-on – and England held on to it. Unfortunately, she had accumulated 169 runs by that point.

‘This will hurt’: Edwards looks to next generation after England’s World Cup defeat.

This may not offer the England head coach, Charlotte Edwards, much comfort as she returns from her first World Cup as manager – she is a performance-focused leader, and a loss is a loss. But she has already made a difference. From the low point of dropping eight catches in a single day of Test cricket in Melbourne, six months later England secured more chances this World Cup than any other team. That is something.

England’s Innings Struggles

The issue arose what came after Wolvaardt’s knock. Did anyone inside that England dressing room truly confident they were able to reach a total of more than 300? Undoubtedly no one outside it did. England’s collapse to nought for two and one for three sparked a reaction not of horror but of weary inevitability.

“We do need to enhance our batting performance – I don’t think it’s been reliable at times,” Edwards said after the match. Therein lies the concern. There have been eight totals of more than 300 in this tournament: a portion were hit by Australia, three by India, and two by South Africa. This is the new normal in women’s ODI cricket: in order to compete with the world’s best, England need a batting order which can realistically aim to exceed that milestone. But when nobody except Nat Sciver-Brunt and Heather Knight has a history of consistently scoring meaningful runs, well, the numbers speak for themselves.

Partnership Efforts

Capsey’s century stand with Sciver-Brunt in the semi-final had some value – Capsey showed that she can bat sensibly, at least for 70 balls – but it was insufficient to win the game. In comparison with South Africa, who were able to score 117 runs from their last 10 overs, surpassing the magic 300, because Wolvaardt had faith in the batters following her and felt she had enough freedom to attack. “Knowing what we still had in the sheds with the last 10 coming up, I thought I’d better have a swing,” she told Sky Sports.

Heather Knight and Nat Sciver-Brunt were the sole consistent performers to score runs consistently during the tournament.

Coaching Dilemmas

When Edwards was appointed in April, her dilemma was whether to maintain or change: she opted to give an ageing ODI side who had struggled previously one last shot at World Cup glory. She got it wrong. England return home with the worst of both worlds: without a trophy, and with little basis on which to restructure over the next four years. Five of their top six from the semi-final are probably not featuring in another 50-over World Cup.

A new strategy is now approaching, as Edwards herself indicated. “This is the end of an ODI cycle,” she said. “We’ve got to focus ahead now.”

Upcoming Talent

It’s about time: an opportunity to evaluate at the young left-hander Grace Scrivens, the 20-year-old wicketkeeper Seren Smale and the 18-year-old left-arm spinner Tilly Corteen-Coleman.

The nagging worry is that it might already be too late: England’s most recent set of central contracts were finalized on 1 October. The cricket board has not yet released a full list of contracted players, but it isn’t difficult to deduce that the current World Cup squad are the main beneficiaries.

The Path Ahead

Lack of progress and overconfidence were the twin problems on which the Ashes whitewash was built – time for Edwards to demonstrate that she is serious about preventing their return.