🔗 Share this article

A Denmark-based citizen has been convicted of sharing sexually explicit segments from copyrighted movies and television shows on the social media site Reddit.

Based on a police document reviewed by media outlets, the unnamed man posted 347 video excerpts of nude scenes in a Reddit group he moderated, which were then watched 4.2 million times.

Danish police confirm he has been given a seven-month suspended sentence for violating copyright laws.

Legal analysts explain the defendant was prosecuted under a seldom-invoked provision in Denmark's intellectual property legislation, with the judge finding that by taking the footage out of their intended setting, the accused had damaged the artists' "ethical entitlements".

He has additionally been convicted of distributing more than 25 terabytes of protected digital content.

From March 2022 to mid-2023, the user using the alias "KlammereFyr" on Reddit uploaded sexually explicit clips including over 100 female performers.

He distributed them in the forum he was a administrator of.

According to the Denmark's anti-piracy group the Rights Alliance, his subreddit had more than 6,000 subscribers and users were prompted to ask for clips of particular performers.

In 2023, advocates filed the incident to the police on behalf of the impacted actors, directors and production companies, which led to the forum being shut down.

One actress, one of the actresses whose nude content were shared in the group, explained to local broadcasters at the period she felt there was a difference between appearing unclothed in a film and being shown on Reddit.

The actress stated the uploads constituted "exploitation".

'A significant message'

The man was detained in fall 2024 and admitted guilty to the charges last month.

In a statement after the ruling, the head of the Rights Alliance Maria Fredenslund remarked the outcome sent an "important" signal "that violations of artists' entitlements have repercussions".

The ruling is viewed as unprecedented in Denmark for its application of the "ethical protections" clause of the Danish Copyright Act, which states an artist's work cannot be used in a way which infringes upon their reputation.

Copyright law expert a legal scholar informed BBC News the legal matter was "unusual" for its emphasis on the harm to the dignity of an performer, rather than to them financially.

The extent to which the ruling could affect other countries is unclear.

But she said there may be "an increasing number of these actions" in the coming years with the advancement of AI, where "the sanctity of one's work might be tempered with much more easily".