🔗 Share this article

Last year, star Jude Law stated he “didn’t fear any repercussions” for portraying Vladimir Putin in a cinematic adaptation. This production, however, may align so closely with the mythologized image circulated by Russian state media that, domestically, it reads as a endorsement rather than a critique.

The Crafted Strongman

For years, the Kremlin and its entertainment industry have worked together to forge a tailor-made version of the president. This character is a political superhero devoid of flaws, a former spy reframed as a local 007 who always knows beyond what he shows.

“In Russia, the constructed Putin has long eclipsed the real one.”

Cinematic Reinforcement

One recent example is a television show launched last October, directed by a Kremlin supporter. The protagonist is a fictional blue-eyed lieutenant colonel inexplicably chosen to “rescue” Russia from disorder. Although the character's name a different name, the implication is clear: the savior must be a known figure from the secret services.

Western portrayals frequently result in reinforcing this identical story instead of undercutting it. An adaptation inspired by a bestselling satirical novel aims to subvert the leader's mythology by presenting him not as a cause but as a symptom, shifting the focus to the spin doctors around him.

The Myth of the Reluctant Leader

In the film, Putin is shown as having been chosen by powerful oligarchs to steady the nation because he is “a fit former intelligence agent”. The oligarchs approach him and all but beg him to become president. His response is that he would rather govern from the background, desiring enduring influence.

This narrative is a key piece of state propaganda: the cool, reluctant strategist guided by fate. In reality, none of this ever happened.

The Reality of the Casting Call

Nobody actually pleaded with him to accept the role. The presidency was in essence a selection process with many contenders. Central to this process stood a powerful businessman from the Yeltsin era who planned to control the country de facto.

• His list featured various figures, among them a reformer later murdered and a former spy chief.
• Per an expert who studied his rise, the future president merely met the necessary criteria: obedient, from the security services, and not a communist or a liberal.
• A property developer familiar with the events stated the primary requirement was controllability and faithfulness, not strength.

“The goal wasn't a strong candidate, they needed someone controllable, someone who would obey orders.”

Building the 007 Persona

Analysts concur that the notion of him as a powerful KGB spy was constructed retrospectively. Stories about his “recruitment work” in Dresden fall apart under examination. In essence, he was an administrator and technical tasks, a mid-level functionary not engaged in field operations.

Interestingly, the move to depicting him as a “spy” may in part have been triggered by Daniel Craig’s arrival as 007. His harder interpretation prompted Russian media and social media to draw visual parallels with Putin. Edited images replacing the actor's likeness with his surfaced on Moscow streets, fueling the increasing trend to see him as a Russian 007.

A Diplomatic Opportunity?

Given the casting, an actor well-liked by Russian audiences, the Kremlin are likely to seize the chance to portray this choice as a minor diplomatic triumph. Its exclusion of mass protests, the opposition, or prominent activists from its narrative, despite covering the past decade, is a welcome aspect for state propaganda.

Domestically, Putin is frequently an all-powerful presence who never appears on screen. He is signaled through portraits or calls “from above”. Now, he finally acquires a famous actor's visage—one that could unintentionally echo the very myths it might seek to examine.